Journal article icon

Journal article

Conceptualising diagnostic liminality: a qualitative exploration of the journey to heart failure diagnosis

Abstract:
Background Heart failure (HF) is a global public health priority. HF diagnosis in primary care is linked to improved outcomes, but most patients are diagnosed in hospital. The pathway to HF diagnosis in primary care is poorly understood. Aim To gain deeper understanding of the patient experience of missed opportunities for HF diagnosis. Design and Setting Qualitative study with patients recruited through general practice and community nurse clinics. Method We conducted, remote, semi-structured interviews with 24 patients who had a diagnosis of HF. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Three themes were developed: diagnostic liminality and suffering at the threshold of HF diagnosis (when participants were unwell but not yet diagnosed or were unaware of their diagnosis); meaning and framing in the diagnostic moment; and truth-telling and sense-making facilitating the escape from liminality. Although receiving the diagnosis brought relief, it also came as a shock due to the meanings associated with the term. Some thought HF meant imminent death and was incompatible with living. Participants also described not being properly informed about their diagnosis. Conclusion While life was disrupted by a HF diagnosis, the diagnosis did not enable the transition from liminality. It was truth telling, in combination with careful explanation that facilitated the shift from diagnostic liminality. Through sense-making, participants were able to build an understanding of what HF diagnosis actually meant for them and their future. Clinicians have a vitally important role in guiding patients away from diagnostic liminality through prompt HF diagnosis and thoughtful communication.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp.2025.0698

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9002-3588
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Pages:
BJGP.2025.0698-BJGP.2025.0698
Publication date:
2026-03-30
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2397110
Local pid:
pubs:2397110
Source identifiers:
W7143503378
Deposit date:
2026-06-18
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP