Journal article
Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
- Abstract:
- In the face of the biodiversity crisis, it is argued that we should prioritize species in order to capture high functional diversity (FD). Because species traits often reflect shared evolutionary history, many researchers have assumed that maximizing phylogenetic diversity (PD) should indirectly capture FD, a hypothesis that we name the “phylogenetic gambit”. Here, we empirically test this gambit using data on ecologically relevant traits from >15,000 vertebrate species. Specifically, we estimate a measure of surrogacy of PD for FD. We find that maximizing PD results in an average gain of 18% of FD relative to random choice. However, this average gain obscures the fact that in over one-third of the comparisons, maximum PD sets contain less FD than randomly chosen sets of species. These results suggest that, while maximizing PD protection can help to protect FD, it represents a risky conservation strategy.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 386.9KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.5MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer Nature
- Journal:
- Nature Communications More from this journal
- Volume:
- 9
- Article number:
- 2888
- Publication date:
- 2018-07-23
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-06-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2041-1723
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:854360
- UUID:
-
uuid:9af56715-f887-4eb7-bdbc-90b75fe963e0
- Local pid:
-
pubs:854360
- Source identifiers:
-
854360
- Deposit date:
-
2018-06-01
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Mazel et al
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
-
© 2018 The Authors. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Note: an author correction exists for this article, originally published and available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08612-4
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record