Journal article icon

Journal article

Treaty-Backed Due Diligence Governance: UFLPA’s Travelling Enforcement and Strategic Agency in Malaysia and Vietnam

Abstract:

This article examines a new form of transnational labour and supply-chain governance. It argues that transnational U.S. forced-labour governance, especially Section 307 and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), has evolved from unilateral border enforcement into treaty-backed travelling due diligence governance: a form of indirect governance that travels through international supply chains and economic interconnectivity to reshape labour governance in Southeast Asia. Moving beyond accounts that portray Southeast Asian states as passive recipients, the article shows how governments become rule-shaping agents that embed U.S.-style due diligence into domestic law and industrial policy, and use external pressure to improve domestic governance capabilities. The study combines comparative process-tracing of Malaysia and Vietnam with (i) textual analysis of trade agreements, national action plans, customs/labour cooperation instruments, and selected corporate disclosures; and (ii) event-style evidence around U.S. Customs and Border Protection interceptions in high-exposure sectors, including gloves, palm oil, apparel, electronics, and solar. We advance the concept of treaty-backed travelling due diligence governance, in which forced-labour risk is translated into market-access pressure, contractualisation, and capacity building. Findings reveal divergent adaptation paths. Malaysia follows an enforcement-to-remediation trajectory: Withhold Release Orders (WROs) and UFLPA actions trigger firm-level audits and remediation funds, then scale into a public compliance infrastructure anchored in a national forced-labour action plan. Vietnam pursues a treaty-alignment trajectory: labour commitments under the EU–Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) are paired with supply-chain risk reconfiguration to pre-empt UFLPA frictions. Across the two cases, greater export exposure in high-priority UFLPA sectors is associated with earlier and stronger adoption of forced-labour and due-diligence measures.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.82556/stair.v21i1.623
Publication website:
https://stair.shox.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/STAIR/article/view/623

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0003-7997-136X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
St. Antony’s International Review
Host title:
A Geoeconomic Global South
Journal:
St. Antony’s International Review More from this journal
Volume:
21
Issue:
1
Publication date:
2026-06-20
DOI:


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
STAIR:article/623
Deposit date:
2026-06-22
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP