Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review

Sedlakova, J; Westermair, AL; Biller-Andorno, N; Meier, CA; Trachsel, M

Journal article

Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review

Abstract:: Introduction
Patient decision aids (PDAs) are important tools to empower patients and integrate their preferences and values in the decision-making process. Even though patients with mental health problems have a strong interest in being more involved in decision making about their treatment, research has mainly focused on PDAs for somatic conditions. In this scoping review, we focus on patients suffering from depression and the role of PDAs for this patient group. The review offers an overview of digital and analog PDAs, their advantages and disadvantages as well as recommendations for further research and development.
Methods
A systematic search of the existing literature guided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was conducted. Three electronic literature databases with the appropriate thematic focus were searched (PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science). The search strategy used controlled and natural language to search for the key concepts decision aids and depression. The articles were selected in a two-step process guided by predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We narratively synthetized information extracted from 40 research articles.
Results
We included 40 articles in our review. Our review revealed that there is more focus on digital PDAs in research than in clinical practice. Digitalization can enhance the benefits of PDAs by developing tools that are more efficient, interactive, and personalized. The main disadvantages of both types of PDAs for the treatment of depression are related to time, dissemination, and capacity building for the health care providers. Digital PDAs need to be regularly updated, effective strategies for their dissemination and acceptance need to be identified, and clinicians need sufficient training on how to use digital PDAs. There is more research needed to study which forms of PDAs are most appropriate for various patient groups (e.g., older adults, or patients with comorbidities), and to identify the most effective ways of PDAs' integration in the clinical workflow. The findings from our review could be well aligned with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards.
Discussion
More research is needed regarding effective strategies for the implementation of digital PDAs into the clinical workflow, ethical issues raised by the digital format, and opportunities of tailoring PDAs for diverse patient groups.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Sedlakova, J., Westermair, A. L., Biller-Andorno, N., Meier, C. A., & Trachsel, M. (2023). Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1208889–1208889.

MLA Style

Sedlakova, J, et al. “Comparison of Analog and Digital Patient Decision Aids for the Treatment of Depression: a Scoping Review.” Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 5, 2023, pp. 1208889–89.

Chicago Style

Sedlakova, J, AL Westermair, N Biller-Andorno, CA Meier, and M Trachsel. 2023. “Comparison of Analog and Digital Patient Decision Aids for the Treatment of Depression: a Scoping Review.” Frontiers in Digital Health 5: 1208889–89.
Print