Journal article
False-positive Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests are Prevalent Among Children Under 5 Years of Age in Uganda
- Abstract:
- Background: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) are a cornerstone of malaria testing and treatment efforts globally. However, positive mRDT results can occur after treatment due to antigen persistence, even in the absence of malaria parasites. False-negative mRDTs are well-described, but less is known about the prevalence and consequences of such false-positive results. Methods: We estimated the prevalence of false-positive mRDTs, defined as mRDT(+)/microscopy(−), using data from the 2018–2019 Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS). Children aged <5 years (under-5s) with paired mRDT and microscopy results were included. We estimated the prevalence of false-positive mRDTs among microscopy(−) children using survey weights. We fit bivariate generalized linear models to estimate the prevalence difference (PD) of false-positive mRDTs for pre-specified covariates. We constructed cross-validated weighted lasso regression models to determine which variables best predict false-positive mRDTs among children with recent fever. Results: The prevalence of false-positive mRDTs was 10.7% (849/6786) and was strongly correlated with region-level transmission intensity. Prevalence was higher among children with recent fever (PD: 17.2%; 95% CI: 13.7%, 20.6%), recent antimalarial use (14.7%; 7.1%, 22.3%), and comorbid anemia (8.1%; 5.9%, 10.3%). Prevalence was lower among those with recent antibiotic use (−17.6%; −22.5%, −12.7%). A model with clinical, environmental, and household variables better predicted false-positive mRDTs (weighted AUC = 0.79) than individual models. Conclusions: False-positive mRDTs are prevalent among under-5s in the 2018–19 Uganda MIS and lead to overestimates of community-level malaria prevalence. These results suggest that false-positive mRDTs may also contribute to misdiagnosis and unnecessary antimalarial use in clinical settings.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 832.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/infdis/jiaf604
Authors
+ National Institutes of Health
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/01cwqze88
- Grant:
- T32AI070114
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases More from this journal
- Volume:
- 233
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- e782-e790
- Publication date:
- 2025-11-28
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-11-25
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1537-6613
- ISSN:
-
0022-1899
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2341597
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2341597
- Source identifiers:
-
3859674
- Deposit date:
-
2026-03-17
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record