Journal article icon

Journal article

Psychedelics as moral bioenhancers: protocol for a scoping review of ethical arguments for and against

Abstract:
Background
Moral bioenhancement typically refers to the deliberate use of drugs or biotechnologies, potentially alongside other practices, to attempt to improve oneself morally. In addition to general concerns regarding moral self-bioenhancement, the possibility of using psychedelic substances for such purposes raises distinct ethical questions. As a first step in analysing these questions, we intend to perform a scoping review of the existing arguments for and against the use of psychedelics as moral bioenhancers. We will focus primarily on voluntary use by individuals, although voluntary use by couples or small groups will be considered. The present contribution is a protocol for this scoping review.
Methods
Our scoping review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, which involves five stages: (1) identifying the research question, (2) developing the search strategy, (3) setting inclusion criteria, (4) extracting data, and (5) presenting and analysing the results. We will include both published and unpublished sources if they explicitly present ethical arguments for or against the voluntary use of psychedelics as intentional moral bioenhancers in adults. We will search for relevant studies in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, The National Library of Medicine, the Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Philosopher’s Index, the Bioethics Literature Database, EthxWeb, PhilPapers, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Philosopher’s Index, EBSCO, BASE, and WorldCat. Sources will be excluded if (a) the full text is inaccessible, (b) the main text is in a language other than English, or (c) the focus is not primarily on ethical arguments (for example, focusing primarily on the clinical use of psychedelics for treatment). Two raters will independently assess all articles for eligibility, with disagreements to be resolved with a third reviewer. Data from eligible articles will be charted using a standardised data extraction form. The data will be analysed following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23414.1

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0471-3000
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Uehiro Institute
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5957-6376
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7445-4599
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
226801/Z/22/Z


Publisher:
F1000Research
Journal:
Wellcome Open Research More from this journal
Volume:
10
Article number:
3
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2025-01-13
Acceptance date:
2025-03-24
DOI:
EISSN:
2398-502X
Pmid:
40134829


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2082917
Local pid:
pubs:2082917
Deposit date:
2025-05-20
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP