Journal article icon

Journal article

Strong and weak random walks on signed networks

Abstract:
Random walks are essential for analyzing complex networks. On signed networks, where edges can be positive or negative, designing random walks that capture signed community structure is challenging. Communities in signed networks typically have predominantly positive internal edges and negative external edges. While prior methods focus on strong balance (two communities), this scenario is rare in empirical networks. We introduce a random walk framework tailored to weak balance, accommodating networks with more than two communities. This approach generates a similarity matrix that enables effective community detection. Comparing strong and weak walks on synthetic and empirical networks, we demonstrate that weak walks outperform strong walks in scenarios involving more than two communities or asymmetric link densities. Our findings suggest that replacing strong walks with weak walks could enhance other signed network random-walk algorithms, broadening their applicability to more realistic network structures.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1038/s44260-025-00027-1

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Mathematical Institute
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Mathematical Institute
Oxford college:
Somerville College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0583-4595


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0439y7842
Grant:
EP/V03474X/1
EP/Y028872/1
EP/V013068/1
EP/W523781/1


Publisher:
Springer Nature
Journal:
npj Complexity More from this journal
Volume:
2
Issue:
1
Article number:
4
Publication date:
2025-02-03
Acceptance date:
2024-12-30
DOI:
EISSN:
2731-8753


Language:
English
Pubs id:
2074540
Local pid:
pubs:2074540
Deposit date:
2025-01-05
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP