Journal article

The flying bomb and the actuary

Abstract:: Liam P. Shaw and Luke F. Shaw follow in the footsteps of R. D. Clarke, a British actuary who sought to determine whether the apparent clustering of V-1 strikes on London during the Second World War was the result of targeting or random chance.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Shaw, L., & Shaw, L. (2019). The flying bomb and the actuary. Significance, 16(5), 12–17.

MLA Style

Shaw, L., and L. Shaw. “The Flying Bomb and the Actuary.” Significance, vol. 16, no. 5, 2019, pp. 12–17.

Chicago Style

Shaw, L., and L. Shaw. 2019. “The Flying Bomb and the Actuary.” Significance 16 (5): 12–17.
Print

Access Document

Files:: ShawShawAAM2019.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 1.0MB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01315.x

Authors

+ Shaw, L More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Department:: NDM
Sub department:: NDM Experimental Medicine
Department:: Unknown
Role:: Author

+ Shaw, L More by this author

Sub department:: NDM Experimental Medicine
Role:: Author

Publisher:: Royal Statistical Society
Journal:: Significance More from this journal
Volume:: 16
Issue:: 5
Pages:: 12-17
Publication date:: 2019-10-01
Acceptance date:: 2019-07-11
DOI:: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01315.x
EISSN:: 1740-9713
ISSN:: 1740-9705

Language:: English
Keywords:: FFR
Pubs id:: pubs:1070483
UUID:: uuid:956eb915-04d6-48fe-b602-0ce26dd24321
Local pid:: pubs:1070483
Source identifiers:: 1070483
Deposit date:: 2019-11-08
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_956eb91504d648feb6020ce26dd24321

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: The Royal Statistical Society
Copyright date:: 2019
Rights statement:: © 2019 The Royal Statistical Society.
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01315.x

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP