Journal article icon

Journal article

Not all tumors are alike: varying efficacy of FLASH across tumor types and oxygenation status in spheroid models

Abstract:
Objectives: Ultra-high dose rate irradiation (UHDR) has been shown to spare normal tissue in various model systems. This study evaluates its potential to sterilize cancer cells using spheroid tumor models. Methods: Spheroids from glioblastoma (U87), hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (2 sizes, FaDusmall and FaDularge) and breast adenocarcinoma (T47D) cells were irradiated with electron beams using UHDR (>200 Gy/s) or conventional dose rate (CONV, ∼0.1 Gy/s) exposures under ambient or reduced oxygen (1%) conditions. U87 and FaDusmall were also irradiated with protons. Spheroids were monitored using imaging for up to 100 days to determine the dose required to cure 50% of spheroids (SCD50). These data were used to calculate dose-modifying factor estimates for UHDR at the 50% survival level (DMFSCD50). Results: A total of 3230 spheroids were analyzed. Under ambient oxygen tension, UHDR and CONV showed no significant differences in U87 (DMFSCD50 = 0.98, P = .47), FaDusmall (DMFSCD50 = 1.01, P = .75), and T47D (DMFSCD50 = 1.04, P = .25), regardless of electron or proton irradiation. Under reduced oxygen levels, significantly higher UHDR doses were required to sterilize the spheroids, with DMFSCD50 1.14 (U87, P < .01), 1.07 (FaDusmall, P = .02), and 1.13 (T47D, P < .01). FaDularge-spheroids irradiated under ambient oxygen showed a DMFSCD50 of 1.66 (P < .001). Conclusion: Using spheroid tumor models with long follow-up, we demonstrate that efficacy of UHDR varies across cancer types and conditions. Whereas small spheroids exhibit iso-efficacy, both reduced oxygen tension and increased spheroid size lead to higher DMF. Advances in knowledge: This preclinical study suggests that tumor iso-efficacy with UHDR may not hold true for all cancer types and is associated with oxygen level.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/bjr/tqaf219

Authors


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/04wv8j283
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0527jb766
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/00292rj97
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0433fd238


Publisher:
British Institute of Radiology
Journal:
British Journal of Radiology More from this journal
Volume:
99
Issue:
1177
Pages:
65-72
Publication date:
2025-08-28
Acceptance date:
2025-08-20
DOI:
EISSN:
1748-880X
ISSN:
0007-1285


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2287819
UUID:
uuid_94a5a1eb-a6c4-4a54-9b1f-9048582ef462
Local pid:
pubs:2287819
Source identifiers:
3740588
Deposit date:
2026-02-09
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP