Microporous titanium and hydroxyapatite improve fixation of the tibial wall in unicompartmental knee replacement

Journal article

Purpose
Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR) is associated with less pain than cemented OUKR 5 years postoperatively. This may be due to improved fixation at the tibial wall, which transmits tension and reduces stress in the bone below the tibial component. This study compares tibial wall fixation with three different types of fixation: cemented, cementless with hydroxyapatite (HA) and cementless with a microporous titanium coat and HA (HA + MPC).

Methods
Three consecutive cohorts were identified (n = 221 cemented in 2005–2007, n = 118 HA in 2014–2015, n = 125 HA + MPC in 2016–2017). Analysis was performed on anterior–posterior radiographs aligned on the tibial component taken 1–2 years postoperatively. Aligned radiographs are needed to see narrow radiolucencies adjacent to the wall. Alignment was assessed with rotation ratio (RR = wall width/internal wall height). Perfect RR is 0.3, and a maximum threshold of 0.5 was used. Quality of fixation to the wall was assessed with fixation ratio (FR = bone wall contact height/total wall height). Notable radiographic features at the tibial wall were also recorded.

Results
A total of 33 knees with cement, 37 knees with cementless with HA and 57 knees cementless with HA + MPC had adequately aligned radiographs. Fixation was significantly better with HA compared with cement (55% vs. 25%, p = 0.0016). The microporous coat further improved fixation (81% vs. 55%, p < 0.0001). FR > 80% was achieved in 3% of the cemented implants, 32% of HA and 68% of HA + MPC. In cementless cohorts, features suggestive of a layer of bone that had delaminated from the wall were seen in 8 (22%) HA and 3 (5%) HA + MPC knees.

Conclusion
Radiographic tibial wall fixation in OUKR is poor with cement. It improves with an HA coating and improves further with an intermediary MPC. Improved tibial wall fixation may explain the lower levels of pain observed with cementless rather than cemented fixation described in the literature, but further clinical correlation is needed.

Authors: Rahman, A; Omoregie, G; Mellon, S; Murray, DW

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Wiley
• Journal: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
• Volume: 32
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 704-712
• Place of publication: Germany
• Publication date: 2024-02-28
• Acceptance date: 2024-02-02
• DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12092
• EISSN: 1433-7347
• ISSN: 0942-2056
• Pmid: 38415874
• Language: English
• Keywords: arthroplasty; replacement; knee; cemented; cementless; knee replacement; unicompartmental; orthopaedic fixation devices; pain