Journal article
Identification of an optimal mutant allele frequency to detect activating KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in a commercial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing assay in colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinomas
- Abstract:
-
Background
Evaluation for activating mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in colorectal cancer (CRC) and in KRAS in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential for clinical care. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows convenient assessment of a tumor's molecular profile, however low tumor DNA shedding limits sensitivity. We investigated mutant allele frequency (MAF) of other oncogenic dominant genes to identify a threshold for accurate detection of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF (RAS/RAF) mutations in cfDNA.Methods
Molecular and clinical data were obtained from the Duke Molecular Registry of Tumors and the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA study. Patients with CRC or PDAC and a KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF activating single nucleotide variant (SNV) present on tissue NGS and with available cfDNA assays were included. Recursive partitioning and Wilcoxon-rank statistics methods identified potential cut-points for discriminative MAF values.Results
One hundred and thirty-five CRC and 30 PDAC cases with 198 total cfDNA assays met criteria. Greatest non-RAS/RAF dominant gene MAF of 0.34% provided maximum discrimination for predicting RAS/RAF SNV detection. Sensitivity for RAS/RAF SNVs increased with dominant gene MAF, with MAF ≥1% predicting sensitivity >98%, MAF between 0.34 and 1% predicting sensitivity of 84.0%, and MAF £0.34% predicting sensitivity of 50%. For 43 cfDNA assays that did not detect RAS/RAF SNVs, 18 assays detected 34 other oncogenic variants, of which 80.6% were not also detected on tissue.Conclusions
Non-RAS/RAF dominant oncogenic mutation MAF ≥1% on cfDNA NGS predicts high sensitivity to detect RAS/RAF oncogenic SNVs in CRC and PDAC. MAF £0.34% indicates an assay may not reliably detect RAS/RAF SNVs, despite detection on tissue testing. Most variants from assays that did not detect RAS/RAF had MAF <1% and were not detected on tissue, suggesting potential confounding. These data suggest a practical approach to determining cfDNA assay adequacy, with implications for guiding clinical decisions in CRC and PDAC.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, x-empty, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.21037/jgo-23-114
Authors
- Publisher:
- AME Publishing
- Journal:
- Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 05
- Pages:
- 2083-2096
- Publication date:
- 2023-09-19
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2219-679X
- ISSN:
-
2078-6891
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2345233
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2345233
- Source identifiers:
-
W4388159482
- Deposit date:
-
2025-12-05
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2023
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record