Journal article
Improving outcomes for very preterm babies in England: does place of birth matter? Findings from OPTI-PREM, a national cohort study
- Abstract:
-
Objective Babies born between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks of gestation contribute substantially towards infant mortality and morbidity. In England, their care is delivered in maternity services colocated with highly specialised neonatal intensive care units (NICU) or less specialised local neonatal units (LNU). We investigated whether birth setting offered survival and/or morbidity advantages to inform National Health Service delivery.
Design Retrospective national cohort study.
Setting LNU, NICU, England.
Patients UK National Neonatal Research Database whole population data for births between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks of gestation, discharged from/died within neonatal units between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. We linked baby-level data to mortality information from the Office for National Statistics.
Outcome measures Death during neonatal care, up to 1 year (infant mortality), surgically treated necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, severe brain injury (SBI), bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Intervention Birth in NICU versus LNU setting. We used an instrumental variable (maternal excess travel time between the nearest NICU and LNU) estimation approach to determine treatment effect.
Results Of 18 847 babies (NICU: 10 379; LNU: 8468), 574 died in NICU/LNU care, and 121 postdischarge (infant mortality 3.7%). We found no effect of birth setting on neonatal or infant mortality. Significantly more babies born into LNU settings experienced SBI (mean difference −1.1% (99% CI −2.2% to −0.1%)). This was attenuated after excluding births at 27 weeks, and early postnatal transfers.
Conclusions In England, LNU teams should use clinical judgement, risk assessing benefits of transfer versus risk of SBI for preterm births at 27 weeks of gestation. 28 weeks of gestation is a safe threshold for preterm birth in either NICU/LNU settings.
Trial registration number NCT02994849/ISRCTN74230187.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 563.7KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Supplementary materials, pdf, 274.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327474
Authors
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/015ah0c92
- Grant:
- 15/70/104
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition More from this journal
- Volume:
- 110
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 444-451
- Publication date:
- 2024-12-27
- Acceptance date:
- 2024-12-08
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1468-2052
- ISSN:
-
1359-2998
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2073882
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2073882
- Deposit date:
-
2024-12-31
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Pillay et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record