Journal article icon

Journal article

‘It is just a prediction; it’s, like, not fact’: youth attitudes towards risk prediction tools and personalised preventive interventions for depression and anxiety

Abstract:
Background: Risk prediction tools may help identify youth who are at risk of developing depression or anxiety and allow personalised preventive interventions to be delivered. However, with concerns for implementation, it is important to directly engage with youth to understand their attitudes. Objective: To qualitatively explore UK-based youth attitudes towards risk prediction tools and personalised preventive interventions for depression and anxiety. Methods: Online semistructured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of youth aged 16–25 years (n=25) and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings: Analysis generated four themes: (1) Helpful or harmful: risk prediction as a ‘double-ended sword’ explores the potential benefits and consequences of risk scores; (2) ‘Taken with a grain of salt’: are risk prediction models the way forward? focuses on participants’ scepticism towards risk prediction tools, including ethics and privacy; (3) ‘It really depends on the person’: respecting the individual in prevention emphasises the importance of personal choice and individual differences and (4) ‘You still need like a person in the process’: the importance of human involvement encapsulates participants’ belief regarding human involvement in development and implementation. Conclusions: While youth appear open to risk prediction tools and personalised preventive interventions, they highlighted concerns that must be addressed before implementation, including ethics, accuracy, privacy and feasibility. Clinical implications: Going forward, researchers should prioritise stakeholder involvement, using active collaboration to identify ways in which these concerns can be addressed, which may increase acceptability and uptake. Human contact, alongside agency and choice, are further factors to consider.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjment-2025-302327

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6926-0463
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3071-0076
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1864-1861


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100023875
Grant:
Not applicable


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Mental Health More from this journal
Volume:
29
Issue:
1
Pages:
e302327
Article number:
bmjment-2025-302327
Publication date:
2026-05-06
Acceptance date:
2026-04-13
DOI:
EISSN:
2755-9734
ISSN:
2755-9734


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
4064889
Deposit date:
2026-05-20
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP