Journal article
Multicenter diagnostic evaluation of onsite COVID-19 Rapid Test (CTK Biotech) among symptomatic individuals in Brazil and the United Kingdom
- Abstract:
- The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to numerous commercially available antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs). To generate and to share accurate and independent data with the global community requires multisite prospective diagnostic evaluations of Ag-RDTs. This report describes the clinical evaluation of the OnSite COVID-19 rapid test (CTK Biotech, CA, USA) in Brazil and the United Kingdom. A total of 496 paired nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from symptomatic health care workers at Hospital das Clínicas in São Paulo, Brazil, and 211 NP swabs were collected from symptomatic participants at a COVID-19 drive-through testing site in Liverpool, United Kingdom. Swabs were analyzed by Ag-RDT, and results were compared to quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR). The clinical sensitivity of the OnSite COVID-19 rapid test in Brazil was 90.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.1 to 96.7%) and in the United Kingdom was 75.3% (95% CI, 64.6 to 83.6%). The clinical specificity in Brazil was 99.4% (95% CI, 98.1 to 99.8%) and in the United Kingdom was 95.5% (95% CI, 90.6 to 97.9%). Concurrently, analytical evaluation of the Ag-RDT was assessed using direct culture supernatant of SARS-CoV-2 strains from wild-type (WT), Alpha, Delta, Gamma, and Omicron lineages. This study provides comparative performance of an Ag-RDT across two different settings, geographical areas, and populations. Overall, the OnSite Ag-RDT demonstrated a lower clinical sensitivity than claimed by the manufacturer. The sensitivity and specificity from the Brazil study fulfilled the performance criteria determined by the World Health Organization, but the performance obtained from the UK study failed to do. Further evaluation of Ag-RDTs should include harmonized protocols between laboratories to facilitate comparison between settings
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 305.8KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1128/spectrum.05044-22
Authors
Contributors
+ Hayward, G
- Institution:
- University of Oxford
- Division:
- MSD
- Department:
- Primary Care Health Sciences
- Role:
- Contributor
+ National Institute for Health Research
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/0187kwz08
- Grant:
- MINBUZA-2020.961444
- Publisher:
- American Society for Microbiology
- Journal:
- Microbiology Spectrum More from this journal
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 3
- Article number:
- e0504422
- Place of publication:
- United States
- Publication date:
- 2023-05-22
- Acceptance date:
- 2023-04-17
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2165-0497
- Pmid:
-
37212699
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1877917
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1877917
- Deposit date:
-
2024-07-18
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Thompson et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2023
- Rights statement:
- © 2023 Thompson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record