Journal article
Reported problems and responses during the conduct of stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials in healthcare settings: a qualitative systematic review
- Abstract:
-
Background: The Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial (SW-CRT) is a pragmatic complex design which can be difficult to implement. We aimed to summarise the reported problems and responses to problems, in studies recently published after the publication of the reporting guidelines for SW-CRTs.
Methods: We searched the literature for SW-CRTs published between 9 November 2018 and 23 February 2021 to identify reported SW-CRT-related problems (defined as relating to the components of the design, i.e., involving clusters and the staggered intervention implementation) and responses to problems. We carried out a thematic analysis to derive descriptive themes and overarching analytical themes.
Results: Among 84 included SW-CRTs, 62 (74%) reported 107 problems related to the SW-CRT design, and 38 responses to 36 problems were reported by 24 trials. The ‘problems’ formed six descriptive problem themes: ‘participant recruitment’, ‘cluster issues’ (e.g. cluster merger or drop-out), ‘internal factors’ (e.g. logistic or administrative issues), ‘external factors’ (e.g. weather or religious events), ‘outcome measurement’ (e.g. practicalities around measurement of repeated outcomes) and ‘intervention implementation’ (e.g. delays or contamination).
The ‘responses’ formed six descriptive themes: ‘adding new clusters’, ‘modifying the randomisation’, ‘reducing contamination’, ‘changing outcomes’, ‘intention-to-treat’ and ‘modifying the analysis’.
Conclusions: SW-CRTs commonly run into problems. Two overarching and conflicting analytical problem themes emerged: the ‘struggle to adhere to the protocol’, given the defining features of the SW-CRT design, when faced against ‘real-life pressures’ created by internal and external factors. Further research is needed to explore whether responses to these problems have resource or integrity ramifications.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Supplementary materials, pdf, 247.0KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 925.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/ije/dyaf217
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- International Journal of Epidemiology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 55
- Issue:
- 1
- Article number:
- dyaf217
- Publication date:
- 2026-01-02
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-11-12
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1464-3685
- ISSN:
-
0300-5771
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2329130
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2329130
- Deposit date:
-
2025-11-18
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Taylor et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record