Journal article icon

Journal article

Incidence, severity, help seeking, and management of uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a population-based survey

Abstract:
Background: Limited knowledge of the population incidence and management of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) limits information provision and interventions to enhance care in the community. Aim: To describe incidence and severity, help seeking, and management of UTI from a population perspective. Design and setting: Household survey in England in 2014. Method: In total, a random sample of 2424 females aged ≥16 years were interviewed in their own homes using computer-assisted interviewing about their UTI symptoms, help seeking, and management. Data were weighted by sex, age, ethnicity, working status, social grade, and housing tenure, and Government Office Region to be broadly representative of the general population. Results: Of the females interviewed, 892 (37%) reported having had at least one UTI in their lifetime (29% had more than one episode). In the past year, 11% of all females reported a UTI and 3% recurrent UTI (≥3 or more). Of those who had ever had a UTI, 48% rated their last UTI as fairly or very severe. In total, 95% consulted a health professional; 65% at their local GP practice during routine consulting hours. Out-of-hours consulting was uncommon but more prevalent in younger females. Of those contacting a health professional, 76% had a urine test, 74% were prescribed an antibiotic, but only 63% of these reported taking the antibiotic. Delayed antibiotic prescribing was rare. Conclusion: UTI symptoms are common; most females consult in general practice, and are prescribed antibiotics, but one-third report not taking the antibiotics as prescribed. Benefit and harms in those taking, and not taking, antibiotics need to be better understood in order to improve help seeking, management, and adherence. Urine tests and antibiotics could be reduced by basing empirical antibiotics on symptoms, and increasing use of back-up prescriptions.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp15X686965

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
British Journal of General Practice
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
65
Issue:
639
Pages:
e702-e707
Publication date:
2015-10-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:578262
UUID:
uuid:92627226-c044-4a76-8338-85a4ef4d0b03
Local pid:
pubs:578262
Source identifiers:
578262
Deposit date:
2015-12-04

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP