Journal article icon

Journal article

How Well Can We Assess Our Ability to Understand Others’ Feelings? Beliefs About Taking Others’ Perspectives and Actual Understanding of Others’ Emotions

Abstract:
People vary in their beliefs about their tendency to engage in perspective taking and to understand other's feelings. Often, however, those beliefs are suggested to be poor indicators of actual skills and thus provide an inaccurate reflection of performance. Few studies, however, have examined whether people's beliefs accurately predict their performance on emotion recognition tasks using dynamic or spontaneous emotional expressions. We report six studies (N ranges from 186 to 315; N total = 1,347) testing whether individuals' report of their engagement in perspective taking, as measured by the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1983), is associated with accurate emotion recognition. In Studies 1-3, emotion recognition performance was assessed using three standard tests of nonverbal emotion recognition. To provide a more naturalistic test, we then assessed performance with a new emotion recognition test in Studies 4-6, using videos of real targets that share their emotional experiences. Participants' multi-scalar ratings of the targets' emotions were compared with the targets' own emotion ratings. Across all studies, we found a modest, yet significant positive relationship: people who believe that they take the other's perspective also perform better in tests of emotion recognition (r = 0.20, p < 0.001). Beliefs about taking others' perspective thus reflect interpersonal reality, but only partially.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02475

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1289-223X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4872-0536
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6939-8174


Publisher:
Frontiers Media
Journal:
Frontiers in Psychology More from this journal
Volume:
10
Pages:
2475-2475
Publication date:
2019-11-11
DOI:
EISSN:
1664-1078
ISSN:
1664-1078


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2381165
Local pid:
pubs:2381165
Source identifiers:
W2988654470
Deposit date:
2026-03-04
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP