Journal article
Strengthening the security of authenticated key exchange against bad randomness
- Abstract:
- Recent history has revealed that many random number generators (RNGs) used in cryptographic algorithms and protocols were not providing appropriate randomness, either by accident or on purpose. Subsequently, researchers have proposed new algorithms and protocols that are less dependent on the RNG. One exception is that all prominent authenticated key exchange (AKE) protocols are insecure given bad randomness, even when using good long-term keying material. We analyse the security of AKE protocols in the presence of adversaries that can perform attacks based on chosen randomness, i.e., attacks in which the adversary controls the randomness used in protocol sessions. We propose novel stateful protocols, which modify memory shared among a user’s sessions, and show in what sense they are secure against this worst case randomness failure. We develop a stronger security notion for AKE protocols that captures the security that we can achieve under such failures, and prove that our main protocol is correct in this model. Our protocols make substantially weaker assumptions on the RNG than existing protocols.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 518.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/s10623-017-0337-5
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer Verlag
- Journal:
- Designs, Codes and Cryptography More from this journal
- Volume:
- 86
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 481-516
- Publication date:
- 2017-02-13
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-01-24
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-7586
- ISSN:
-
0925-1022
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:681626
- UUID:
-
uuid:909107fa-62b5-41d2-aeda-98fc7a697290
- Local pid:
-
pubs:681626
- Source identifiers:
-
681626
- Deposit date:
-
2017-06-14
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from Springer Verlag at: 10.1007/s10623-017-0337-5
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record