Conference item
Disciplinary differences in library search: insights into researchers’ mental models of knowledge organisation
- Abstract:
-
Why did you do this activity, project, or research?
Why do researchers seek information in specific ways, and how do their approaches vary across disciplines? This lightning talk presents preliminary findings from a study exploring how researchers’ mental models of knowledge organisation influence their use of library search and discovery systems. By focusing on disciplinary differences, the research lays the groundwork for improving library interfaces to better serve diverse academic communities.
How did you do this?
The study uses qualitative, library UX, and ethnographic methods, with case studies from four disciplines: chemistry, history, law, and medicine. It investigates how researchers perceive and interact with knowledge structures in their fields.
What did you discover?
Preliminary findings suggest that frequent use of particular information systems shapes researchers’ mental models, fostering confidence and trust in some academic disciplines while leaving others frustrated by fragmented or decentralised repositories. Scholars adapt their thinking to align with system designs to locate information, facing greater difficulty when interfaces are not intuitive. Historians, for example, struggle with dispersed materials and inconsistent access, while chemists and lawyers benefit from specialised platforms like Reaxys and WestLaw. Uncertainty in locating resources links to scepticism about systems and one’s own search skills, while familiarity with centralised systems fosters confidence.
How have findings been applied? What lessons did you learn? What is the potential value to the wider performance measurement/assessment/user experience library community?
While the research does not yet provide actionable insights, these findings underscore the value of investigating disciplinary differences in search behaviour. This work aims to inform the library performance measurement community and facilitate future development of systems that address diverse academic needs, fostering more effective and equitable information-seeking experiences.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Reviewed (other)
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Author's original, pdf, 1.9MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publication website:
- https://libpmc2025.exordo.com/programme/presentation/13
Authors
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/0505m1554
- Grant:
- 2590409
- Publisher:
- International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries
- Publication date:
- 2025-06-04
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-03-07
- Event title:
- 16th International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries (LibPMC 2025)
- Event location:
- Liverpool, UK
- Event website:
- https://libpmc2025.exordo.com/programme/presentation/13
- Event start date:
- 2025-06-03
- Event end date:
- 2025-06-04
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2329464
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2329464
- Deposit date:
-
2025-11-19
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Notes:
- This paper was presented at the 16th International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries (LibPMC 2025), 3rd-4th June 2025, Liverpool, UK. The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record