Journal article
Patient-reported outcomes in KEYNOTE-006, a randomised study of pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma.
- Abstract:
-
Objective
Report results of patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms from phase III KEYNOTE-006 study of pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in patients with ipilimumab-naive advanced melanoma.
Patients and Methods
Patients received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 (Q2W) or every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 2 years, or four cycles of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was administered at baseline and throughout the study. Patientreported outcome (PRO) analyses were pre-specified exploratory endpoints; the primary PRO assessment was the score change from baseline to week 12 in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/HRQoL score between the arms using constrained longitudinal data analysis.
Results
The PRO analysis population included 776 patients: pembrolizumab Q2W (n Z270); pembrolizumab Q3W (n Z 266); ipilimumab (n Z 240). Baseline GHS was similar across arms. QLQ-C30 compliance rates at week 12 were 87% (n Z 214), 97% (n Z 226), and 96% (n Z 178), for the pembrolizumab Q2W, pembrolizumab Q3W, and ipilimumab arms, respectively. From baseline to week 12, GHS/HRQoL scores were better maintained with pembrolizumab than with ipilimumab (decrease of -1.9 and -2.5 for pembrolizumab versus -10.0 for ipilimumab; p < 0.001 for each pembrolizumab arm versus ipilimumab). Fewer patients treated with pembrolizumab experienced deterioration in GHS at week 12 (31% for pembrolizumab Q2W; 29% for Q3W and 44% for ipilimumab), with similar trends observed for individual functioning and symptoms scales.
Conclusions
HRQoL was better maintained with pembrolizumab than with ipilimumab in patients with ipilimumab-naive advanced melanoma.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 409.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.032
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- European Journal of Cancer More from this journal
- Volume:
- 86
- Pages:
- 115-124
- Publication date:
- 2017-10-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-08-28
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1879-0852
- ISSN:
-
0959-8049
- Pmid:
-
28987768
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:736892
- UUID:
-
uuid:8e7057b8-5a94-4c1f-ab99-6eee88bcf098
- Local pid:
-
pubs:736892
- Source identifiers:
-
736892
- Deposit date:
-
2018-01-25
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Middleton et al
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record