Journal article
The impacts of motivational framing of technology restrictions on adolescent concealment: Evidence from a preregistered experimental study
- Abstract:
- Caregivers employ a range of motivational strategies to help regulate and protect adolescents using connective technologies. The present study explored a new conceptual model informed by self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan, 2000, Ryan and Deci, 2000) with a representative sample of 1000 adolescents recruited nationwide within Britain, and using a confirmatory, pre-registered and open science methodology. In this experimental study we compared controlling (pressuring, coercive, or punitive) styles of restricting technology with neutral, and autonomy-supportive (empathic, choice-promoting) styles of restricting to predict adolescents' concealing their technology use from caregivers. We further tested two mechanisms which might explain the links of condition and concealment: perceiving caregivers to be trusting, and experiencing reactance or the desire to do the opposite of what was instructed. Findings are discussed in terms of the role of regulation styles on interpersonal outcomes and adolescent development, and implications for technology use policy and recommendations to caregivers and teachers.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 593.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.053
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Computers in Human Behavior More from this journal
- Volume:
- 90
- Pages:
- 170-180
- Publication date:
- 2018-09-04
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-08-28
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0747-5632
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:933539
- UUID:
-
uuid:8e34fe82-44c9-4557-87fc-499a67322b7e
- Local pid:
-
pubs:933539
- Source identifiers:
-
933539
- Deposit date:
-
2018-11-21
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Ltd
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.053
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record