Journal article icon

Journal article

Changing media depictions of remote consulting in COVID-19: analysis of UK newspapers

Abstract:
Background Remote consulting was introduced quickly into UK general practice in March 2020 as an emergency response to COVID-19. In July 2020, ‘remote-first’ became long-term government policy. Aim To explore how this change was portrayed in national newspapers and how depictions changed over time. Design and setting Thematic analysis of newspaper articles referring to remote GP consultations from two time periods: 2 March–31 May 2020 (period 1) and 30 July–12 August 2020 (period 2). Method Articles were identified through, and extracted from, LexisNexis Academic UK. A coding system of themes and narrative devices was developed and applied to the data. The analysis was developed iteratively, amending the coding structure as new data were added. Results Remote consulting was widely covered in newspapers. Articles in period 1 depicted it positively, equating digital change with progress and linking novel technological solutions with improved efficiency and safety (for example, infection control) in a service that was overdue for modernisation. Articles in period 2 questioned the persistence of a remote-first service now that the pandemic was waning, emphasising, for example, missed diagnoses, challenges to the therapeutic relationship, and digital inequalities. Conclusion As the first wave of the pandemic came and went, media depictions of remote consulting evolved from an ‘efficiency and safety’ narrative to a ‘risks, inequalities, and lack of choice’ narrative. To restore public trust in general practice, public communication should emphasise the wide menu of consulting options now available to patients and measures being taken to assure safety and avoid inequity.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp.2020.0967

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7385-6884
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1189-7100
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3352-943X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2369-8088


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
71
Issue:
702
Pages:
e1-e9
Publication date:
2020-12-04
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1150876
Local pid:
pubs:1150876
Source identifiers:
W3111175032
Deposit date:
2026-02-12
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP