Journal article icon

Journal article

Enhancing experimental design through Bayes factor design analysis: insights from multi-armed bandit tasks

Abstract:
Bayesian statistics offers a flexible framework that supports iterative updating of hypotheses and the incorporation of prior information, amongst other advantages. Although well established for retrospective analysis, the application of Bayesian methods to prospective analysis is less well developed, especially when used in combination with computational model-based analysis of behavioural data in cognitive neuroscience. It is therefore important to establish effective methods for testing and optimising experimental designs for these purposes. One framework for a prospective approach is Bayes factor design analysis (BFDA), which can be used alongside latent variable modelling to evaluate and visualise the distribution of Bayes factors for a given experimental design. This paper provides a tutorial-style analysis combining BFDA with latent variable modelling to evaluate exploration-exploitation trade-offs in the binary multi-armed bandit task (MAB). This is a complex example of human decision-making with which to investigate the feasibility of differentiating latent variables between groups as a function of different design parameters. We examined how sample size, number of games per participant and effect size affect the strength of evidence supporting a difference in means between two groups. To further assess how these parameters affect experimental results, metrics of error were evaluated. Using simulations, we demonstrated how BFDA can be combined with latent variable modelling to evaluate and optimise parameter estimation of exploration in the MAB task, allowing inference of the mean degree of random exploration in a population, as well as between groups. However, BFDA indicated that, even with large samples and effect sizes, there may be some circumstances where there is a high likelihood of errors and a low probability of detecting evidence in favour of a difference when comparing random exploration between two groups performing the bandit task. In summary, we show how BFDA can prospectively inform design and power of human behavioural tasks.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22288.2

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Engineering Science
Sub department:
Institute of Biomedical Engineering
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0009-7827-9682
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2245-4962
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9273-1617


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100000319
Grant:
21537
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100000266
Grant:
EP/W03509X/1
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
214251
More from this funder
Grant:
MSIT2019-0-01371


Publisher:
Taylor and Francis
Journal:
Wellcome Open Research More from this journal
Volume:
9
Pages:
423
Publication date:
2024-01-01
Acceptance date:
2026-04-29
DOI:
EISSN:
2398502X
ISSN:
2398502X
Pmid:
42256493


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
4237662
Deposit date:
2026-06-17
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP