Journal article icon

Journal article

Metallocene-terminated allylium salts: the effect of end group on localization in polymethines.

Abstract:
A range of 1,3-di(metallocenyl)allylium salts [Mc(CH)(3)Mc'](+)[X](-) [Mc, Mc' = ferrocenyl (Fc), 2,3,4,5,1',2',3',4'-octamethylferrocen-1-yl (Fc' '), ruthenocenyl (Rc); X = BF(4), PF(6)] was synthesized by reaction of (2-lithiovinyl)metallocenes with formylmetallocenes, followed by treatment of the resulting alcohols with HX. Two salts with X = BAr'(4) [Ar' = 3,5-(CF(3))(2)C(6)H(3)] were synthesized by anion metathesis from the corresponding PF(6) salts. The crystal structure of [Fc' '(CH)(3)Fc' '](+)[PF(6)](-) contains symmetrical termethine cations, while the same appears to be true in the disordered structure of [Fc(CH)(3)Fc](+)[PF(6)](-). The formally unsymmetrical cation in [Fc(CH)(3)Fc' '](+)[BF(4)](-) is only slightly unsymmetrical with little bond-length alternation in the allylium bridge. In contrast, the crystal structures of [Rc(CH)(3)Rc](+)[PF(6)](-) and [Rc(CH)(3)Rc](+)[BAr'(4)](-) both contain a bond-alternated "Peierls-distorted" cation, which can be considered as a ruthenocene bridged to a [(eta(6)-fulvene)(eta(5)-cyclopentadienyl)ruthenium] cation by a vinylene moiety. The strong similarity between solid-state and solution infrared and Raman spectra of [BF(4)](-), [PF(6)](-), and [BAr'(4)](-) salts of [Rc(CH)(3)Rc](+) indicates that the C-C stretching constant in the allylium chain and, therefore, the structure, of this ion are largely independent of the local environment, suggesting that the unsymmetrical structures observed in the crystal structures are not simply an artifact of packing. Differences in the solvatochromism of [Rc(CH)(3)Rc](+) and [Fc(CH)(3)Fc](+) also suggest a localized structure for the former cation in solution. Electrochemistry, UV-visible-NIR spectroscopy, and DF calculations give insight into the electronic structure of the metallocene-terminated allylium cations. Using an analogy between polymethines and mixed-valence compounds, the difference between the behaviors of [Fc(CH)(3)Fc](+) and [Rc(CH)(3)Rc](+) is attributed to larger reorganization energy associated with the geometry differences between metallocene and [(eta(6)-fulvene)(eta(5)-cyclopentadienyl)metal] structures in the ruthenium case.
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1021/ja012472z

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Chemistry
Sub department:
Inorganic Chemistry
Role:
Author


Journal:
Journal of the American Chemical Society More from this journal
Volume:
124
Issue:
22
Pages:
6285-6296
Publication date:
2002-06-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1520-5126
ISSN:
0002-7863


Language:
English
Pubs id:
pubs:38311
UUID:
uuid:8ce14729-4865-46fe-8557-8328313d5f39
Local pid:
pubs:38311
Source identifiers:
38311
Deposit date:
2012-12-19

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP