Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Application of Transthoracic and Endobronchial Elastography-A Systematic Review

Abstract:
Introduction: Ultrasound elastography is increasingly used across medical imaging, yet its role in thoracic disease remains poorly defined. While both transthoracic ultrasonography (TUS) and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) offer real-time assessment of pleural and pulmonary structures, the diagnostic and clinical value of elastography in this context remains uncertain. Materials and Method: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (April 2023; updated January 2025). Original studies evaluating transthoracic or endobronchial elastography for pleural or pulmonary conditions were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by three reviewers, with QUADAS-2 used to evaluate risk of bias. Results: Thirty studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight evaluated TUS elastography and two examined EBUS. Shear wave elastography was most frequently applied, particularly for differentiating malignant from benign pleural effusion or subpleural lesions. Surface wave elastography demonstrated consistently higher stiffness values in patients with interstitial lung disease compared with healthy controls, correlating with radiological and functional disease severity. Elastography-guided pleural biopsy improved diagnostic yield compared with conventional ultrasound-guided biopsy. Overall, substantial methodological variation existed among scanning techniques, elastography modalities, reporting methods, and diagnostic thresholds, limiting cross-study comparison. Conclusions: Ultrasound elastography shows promise for evaluating pleural effusion and pulmonary lesions, procedural guidance, and interstitial lung disease possibly improving diagnostic possibilities with bedside evaluation and reducing patient exposure to radiation. However, methodological variation and limited high-quality evidence preclude clinical implementation. Standardized acquisition protocols and multicentre validation studies are necessary to define its diagnostic utility in thoracic imaging.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.3390/cancers18020190

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0005-5110-0858
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9103-9549


Publisher:
MDPI
Journal:
Cancers More from this journal
Volume:
18
Issue:
2
Pages:
190
Publication date:
2026-01-07
Acceptance date:
2025-12-24
DOI:
EISSN:
2072-6694
ISSN:
2072-6694
Pmid:
41595113


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2369241
UUID:
uuid_8b35a67e-a825-4541-84a0-035f8f9590fa
Local pid:
pubs:2369241
Source identifiers:
3727817
Deposit date:
2026-02-05
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP