Journal article icon

Journal article

Gefitinib and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Copy Number Aberrations in Esophageal Cancer

Abstract:
Purpose: The cancer esophagus gefitinib (COG) trial demonstrated improved progression free survival with the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), gefitinib relative to placebo in advanced esophageal cancer patients with disease progression after chemotherapy. Rapid and durable responses were observed in a minority. We hypothesised that genetic aberration of the EGFR pathway would identify patients benefitting from gefitinib.

Patients and Methods: A pre-specified blinded molecular analysis of COG trial tumours was conducted to compare efficacy of gefitinib to placebo according to EGFR copy number gain (CNG) and EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutation status. EGFR CNG was determined by fluorescent insitu hybridisation (FISH) using pre-specified criteria and EGFR FISH positive defined as high polysomy or amplification.

Results: Biomarker data were available for 340 patients. In EGFR FISH positive tumours (20.2%) overall survival was improved with gefitinib compared to placebo (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35, 1.00 p=0.05). In EGFR FISH negative tumours there was no difference in overall survival with gefitinib compared to placebo (HR for death, 0.90, 95% CI 0.69, 1.18 p=0.46). EGFR amplification (7.2%) patients gained greatest benefit from gefitinib (HR for death, 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.64; p=0.006). There was no difference in overall survival for gefitinib versus placebo for patients with EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, or for any mutation versus none.

Conclusion: EGFR CNG assessed by FISH appears to identify a subgroup of esophageal cancer patients who may benefit from gefitinib as a second line treatment, and suggests that anti-EGFR 3 therapies should be investigated in prospective clinical trials in different settings in EGFR FI SH positive, and in particular EGFR amplified, esophageal cancer.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1200/JCO.2016.70.3934

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Oxford college:
St John's College
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Centre for Statistics in Medicine
Role:
Author


Publisher:
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Journal:
Journal of Clinical Oncology More from this journal
Volume:
35
Issue:
20
Pages:
2279-2287
Publication date:
2017-05-24
Acceptance date:
2017-03-28
DOI:
EISSN:
1527-7755
ISSN:
0732-183X


Pubs id:
pubs:687763
UUID:
uuid:8983c31d-8bc0-43a4-a5dd-3962c6c478ed
Local pid:
pubs:687763
Source identifiers:
687763
Deposit date:
2017-04-03
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP