Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Personal recovery in mental health difficulties in people with experience of homelessness: qualitative systematic review

Abstract:
Background: Given the complex challenges facing people experiencing homelessness, existing mental health recovery models are probably insufficient for this population. Aims: To investigate qualitative accounts of mental health personal recovery in people with experience of homelessness, and to adapt the widely adopted connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment (CHIME) model of personal recovery to better represent the experiences of this population. Method: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023366842. A systematic review identified qualitative studies investigating first-person accounts of mental health personal recovery in people with experience of homelessness. Nine databases were searched: CINAHL, SCOPUS, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, ASSIA and Social Services Abstracts. Risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Studies Checklist. Included studies underwent ‘best fit’ framework synthesis, comprising deductive analysis using the CHIME first- and second-order themes, as well as inductive analysis to capture aspects not covered by the a priori framework. Results: The review expanded the CHIME model and identified the following recovery processes in this population: security and stability; encouragement and hope; constructing identity; understanding and meaning; relationships and connectedness; and empowerment and dual recovery (SECURED). Importantly, security and stability were identified as a necessary prerequisite for the other recovery processes. Challenges within each recovery process were also identified. Conclusions: SECURED offers a transdiagnostic framework to support understanding of mental health personal recovery in the context of homelessness. Findings support the Housing First model of service provision. However, findings also highlight that housing alone is not sufficient and that the other processes must also be supported.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1192/bjo.2025.10851

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0007-0043-3905
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
BJPsych Open More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
6
Article number:
e265
Publication date:
2025-11-04
Acceptance date:
2025-08-18
DOI:
EISSN:
2056-4724
ISSN:
2056-4724


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2326519
UUID:
uuid_88869bec-8643-4107-9f66-35dc8c11884d
Local pid:
pubs:2326519
Source identifiers:
3436886
Deposit date:
2025-11-04
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP