Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres

Journal article

Clastres ‘de-substantializes' the state, which is not ‘the Elysium, the White House, the Kremlin,' but ‘an actualization of a relation of power.' There is no reason, therefore, to believe that, in a Durkheimian mood, he has reified society. Even though he makes no use of the concept, I believe there is already a concept of ‘sociality' at work in Clastres: hence, the idea of sociality against the state. In the three sections of this study, I show the role played by ‘society,' the ‘state' and ‘against' in Clastres's writings. In this way, I aim to demonstrate that his ethnography is filled with indications about how to deal with some of the continuing dilemmas of anthropology, such as: how can we avoid methodological individualism without becoming spellbound by a transcendental holism or vice-versa? How can we erect models of intentionality without a subject? How can we conceive of social relations without a society? And finally, how does the ‘objectivity' of sociality work through the ‘subjectivity' of personsin-interaction?

Authors: Barbosa, G

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Anthropological Society of Oxford
• Journal: Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford Online
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 368-402
• Publication date: 2017-01-01
• DOI: 10.5287/ora-ye62bawyj
• ISSN: 2040-1876
• Language: English
• Keywords: JASO