The urgent need for evidence in arthroscopic meniscal surgery: a systematic review of the evidence for operative management of meniscal tears

Monk, P; Garfjeld Roberts, P; Palmer, A; Bayliss, L; Mafi, R; Beard, D; Hopewell, S; Price, A

Journal article

The urgent need for evidence in arthroscopic meniscal surgery: a systematic review of the evidence for operative management of meniscal tears

Abstract:: BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic surgery of the knee is one of the most frequently performed orthopaedic procedures. One-third of these procedures are performed for meniscal injuries. It is essential that this commonly performed surgery be supported by robust evidence. PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery for meniscal injuries in all populations. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: An online search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) that compared treatment options for meniscal injury. The following databases (inception to April 2015) were included in the search: CENTRAL; MEDLINE; EMBASE; NHS Evidence; National Guideline Clearing House, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment; ISRCTN; Clinicaltrials.gov; WHO trials platform. Only studies whose participants were selected on the basis of meniscal injury were included; no restrictions were placed on patient demographics. Two independent reviewers applied AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) criteria for SRs and the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool for RCTs. RESULTS: Nine RCTs and 8 SRs were included in the review. No difference was found between arthroscopic meniscal debridement compared with nonoperative management as a first-line treatment strategy for patients with knee pain and a degenerative meniscal tear (mean difference: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, 1.6 [95% CI, -2.2 to 5.2], pain visual analog scale, -0.06 [95% CI, -0.28 to 0.15]). Some evidence was found to indicate that patients with resistant mechanical symptoms who initially fail nonoperative management may benefit from meniscal debridement No studies compared meniscal repair with meniscectomy or nonoperative management. Initial evidence suggested that meniscal transplant might be favorable in certain patient groups. CONCLUSION: Further evidence is required to determine which patient groups have good outcomes from each intervention. Given the current widespread use of arthroscopic meniscal surgeries, more research is urgently needed to support evidence-based practice in meniscal surgery in order to reduce the numbers of ineffective interventions and support potentially beneficial surgery.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Monk, P., Garfjeld Roberts, P., Palmer, A., Bayliss, L., Mafi, R., Beard, D., Hopewell, S., & Price, A. (2016). The urgent need for evidence in arthroscopic meniscal surgery: a systematic review of the evidence for operative management of meniscal tears. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(4), 965–973.

MLA Style

Monk, P., et al. “The Urgent Need for Evidence in Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery: a Systematic Review of the Evidence for Operative Management of Meniscal Tears.” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 45, no. 4, SAGE Publications, 2016, pp. 965–73.

Chicago Style

Monk, P, P Garfjeld Roberts, A Palmer, L Bayliss, R Mafi, D Beard, S Hopewell, and A Price. 2016. “The Urgent Need for Evidence in Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery: a Systematic Review of the Evidence for Operative Management of Meniscal Tears.” American Journal of Sports Medicine 45 (4): 965–73.
Share
Print