Journal article
A matched comparison of long-term outcomes of total and unicompartmental knee replacements in different ages based on national databases: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man
- Abstract:
-
Background
The 2 main treatment options for end-stage single compartment knee arthritis are unicompartmental (UKR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We compared the long-term outcomes in different age groups.
Methods
In total, 54,215 UKRs and 54,215 TKRs from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics database were propensity score matched and Kaplan-Meier and regression analysis used to compare revision, reoperation, mortality, and 3-month complications.
Results
UKR had higher 10-year revision rates (12% vs 5%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.31, P < .001) and 10-year reoperation rates (25% vs 21%, HR 1.12, P < .001). UKR had lower 10-year mortality rates (13.6% vs 15.5%, HR 0.86, P < .001). UKR had lower rates of medical (P < .001) and procedure related (P < .001) complications and deaths (HR 0.61, P = .02). If 100 patients had a UKR instead of a TKR then over 10 years, if they were <55 years old there would be 7 more reoperations and 1 less death; if they were 55-64 years old there would be 6 more reoperations and 2 more deaths; if they were 65-74 years old there would be 4 more reoperations and 2 less deaths; and if they were ≥75 years old there would be 3 more reoperations and 4 less deaths.
Conclusion
UKR has higher revision and slightly higher reoperation rates but lower mortality rates than matched TKR. The decision to do a UKR should, in part, be based on the balance of these risks, which are influenced by patient age. In the elderly group (>75 years) the data suggests that UKR compared to TKR has a greater absolute reduction in mortality than the increase in reoperation rate.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 498.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.018
Authors
+ Royal College of Surgeons of England
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/02qrg5a24
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Journal of Arthroplasty More from this journal
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 243-251
- Place of publication:
- United States
- Publication date:
- 2021-10-04
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-09-26
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1532-8406
- ISSN:
-
0883-5403
- Pmid:
-
34619307
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1202936
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1202936
- Source identifiers:
-
W3203843179
- Deposit date:
-
2026-11-04
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Inc
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.018
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record