Journal article icon

Journal article

A matched comparison of long-term outcomes of total and unicompartmental knee replacements in different ages based on national databases: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man

Abstract:
Background
The 2 main treatment options for end-stage single compartment knee arthritis are unicompartmental (UKR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We compared the long-term outcomes in different age groups.
Methods
In total, 54,215 UKRs and 54,215 TKRs from the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics database were propensity score matched and Kaplan-Meier and regression analysis used to compare revision, reoperation, mortality, and 3-month complications.
Results
UKR had higher 10-year revision rates (12% vs 5%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.31, P < .001) and 10-year reoperation rates (25% vs 21%, HR 1.12, P < .001). UKR had lower 10-year mortality rates (13.6% vs 15.5%, HR 0.86, P < .001). UKR had lower rates of medical (P < .001) and procedure related (P < .001) complications and deaths (HR 0.61, P = .02). If 100 patients had a UKR instead of a TKR then over 10 years, if they were <55 years old there would be 7 more reoperations and 1 less death; if they were 55-64 years old there would be 6 more reoperations and 2 more deaths; if they were 65-74 years old there would be 4 more reoperations and 2 less deaths; and if they were ≥75 years old there would be 3 more reoperations and 4 less deaths.
Conclusion
UKR has higher revision and slightly higher reoperation rates but lower mortality rates than matched TKR. The decision to do a UKR should, in part, be based on the balance of these risks, which are influenced by patient age. In the elderly group (>75 years) the data suggests that UKR compared to TKR has a greater absolute reduction in mortality than the increase in reoperation rate.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.018

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Institute for Musculoskeletal Sciences
Oxford college:
University College
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3015-0432
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Botnar Institute for Musculoskeletal Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0839-3166


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Journal of Arthroplasty More from this journal
Volume:
37
Issue:
2
Pages:
243-251
Place of publication:
United States
Publication date:
2021-10-04
Acceptance date:
2021-09-26
DOI:
EISSN:
1532-8406
ISSN:
0883-5403
Pmid:
34619307


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1202936
Local pid:
pubs:1202936
Source identifiers:
W3203843179
Deposit date:
2026-11-04
ARK identifier:


Title:
DOI:
Request object version
Created date:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP