Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

A Review of Life Cycle Assessment Methods to Inform the Scale‐Up of Carbon Dioxide Removal Interventions

Abstract:
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods are increasingly used for policy decision‐making in the context of identifying and scaling up sustainable carbon dioxide removal (CDR) interventions. This article critically reviews CDR LCA case‐studies through three key lenses relevant to policy decision‐making on sustainable CDR scale‐up, namely comparability across CDR assessments, assessment of the climatic merit of a CDR intervention, and consideration of wider CDR co‐benefits and impacts. Our results show that while providing valuable life cycle understanding, current practices utilize diverse methods, usually attributional in nature, which are CDR and time‐specific. As a result, they do not allow comprehensive cross‐comparison between CDRs, nor reveal the potential consequences of scaling up CDRs in the future. We suggest CDR LCA design requires clearer definitions of the study scope and goal, the use of more consistent functional units, greater comprehensiveness in system boundaries, and explicit baseline definitions. This would allow for robust assessments, facilitating comparison with other CDR methods, and better evidencing net climate benefits. The inventory should collect time‐dependent data on the full CDR life cycle and baseline, and report background assumptions. The impact assessment phase should evidence the climatic merits, co‐benefits, and trade‐offs potentially caused by the expanding CDR. Finally, to ensure a sustainable scale‐up of CDR, consequential analyses should be performed, and interpretation involves the comparison of all selected metrics and the permanence of carbon storage against a baseline scenario.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1002/wene.540

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9908-220X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7863-1767
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5241-2435
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9911-0685
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9058-5740


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/001aqnf71


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
WIREs: Energy and Environment More from this journal
Volume:
13
Issue:
6
Article number:
e540
Publication date:
2024-11-05
Acceptance date:
2024-09-27
DOI:
ISSN:
2041-8396 and 2041-840X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Source identifiers:
2397547
Deposit date:
2024-11-06
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP