Journal article

Religious education as a dialogue with difference: fostering democratic citizenship through the study of religions in schools

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Fancourt, N. (2019). Religious education as a dialogue with difference: fostering democratic citizenship through the study of religions in schools. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 40(4), 493–494.

MLA Style

Fancourt, N. “Religious Education as a Dialogue with Difference: Fostering Democratic Citizenship through the Study of Religions in Schools.” Journal of Beliefs and Values, vol. 40, no. 4, Taylor and Francis, 2019, pp. 493–94.

Chicago Style

Fancourt, N. 2019. “Religious Education as a Dialogue with Difference: Fostering Democratic Citizenship through the Study of Religions in Schools.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 40 (4): 493–94.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: FancourtAAM2019.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 158.8KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1080/13617672.2019.1646607

Authors

+ Fancourt, N More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: SSD
Department:: Education
Role:: Author
ORCID:: 0000-0002-0822-6157

Publisher:: Taylor and Francis
Journal:: Journal of Beliefs and Values More from this journal
Volume:: 40
Issue:: 4
Pages:: 493-494
Publication date:: 2019-07-26
Acceptance date:: 2019-07-19
DOI:: 10.1080/13617672.2019.1646607
EISSN:: 1361-7672
ISSN:: 1469-9362

Language:: English
Keywords:: FFR
Pubs id:: pubs:1035383
UUID:: uuid:837ced46-861c-4ae4-a7a2-374baa32d9f4
Local pid:: pubs:1035383
Source identifiers:: 1035383
Deposit date:: 2019-07-26

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Fancourt
Copyright date:: 2019
Rights statement:: © 2019 Nigel Fancourt.
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Taylor and Francis at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2019.1646607

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP