Telehealth and Remote Interventions for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Scoping Review

Journal article

BackgroundRemote treatment, or telehealth, has shown promise for children with cerebral palsy (CP) prior to 2020; however, the beginning of the global COVID-19 pandemic limiting access to hospitals for face-to-face treatments has driven the need for telehealth and led to a surge in its development. Due to the recent developments, there has been limited synthesis of the available evidence of telehealth for children with CP. ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyze and summarize the existing evidence for telehealth interventions for the treatment of children with CP and identify any areas requiring further research. MethodsA scoping review was performed. A systematic search of available literature in MEDLINE and PubMed was performed during July 2021. Inclusion criteria for articles were primary research and systematic reviews that investigated telehealth, included children with CP, were published between 2010-2021, and were written in English. Exclusion criteria were secondary research other than systematic reviews; interventions that did not meet the World Health Organization definition of telehealth; or studies where all participants were aged >18 years, children’s results were not reported separately, or there were no results reported for children with CP. A scoping review was chosen due to the expected heterogeneity of the participants, as well as the expected small sample sizes and inconsistency of measured outcomes; therefore, a narrative reporting of the results was considered appropriate. ResultsIn all, 5 papers were identified, which included the results of 11 studies—2 of the included articles were systematic reviews, which included the results of 3 studies each. These 6 studies, together with 5 primary research articles, were included in this scoping review. The existing evidence is of low methodological quality, primarily consisting of case series. There is some evidence that the requirements of telehealth differ depending on the children’s developmental stage and functional level. Telehealth is reported to reduce caregiver burden. There is mixed evidence on children’s compliance with telehealth. Overall, the results of telehealth interventions for the treatment of children with CP were positive, indicating either comparable or improved results compared with children receiving usual face-to-face care. ConclusionsThe evidence base is lacking in breadth and methodological quality to provide robust clinical recommendations. Most studies investigated hand function only, indicating the limited scope of existing research. However, this review shows that telehealth has demonstrated potential to improve function for children with CP while making health care services more accessible and reducing caregiver burden. Areas requiring further research include telehealth interventions for the lower limb, postural management, and pain control and the barriers to implementing telehealth

Authors: Pagaki-Skaliora, M; Morrow, E; Theologis, T

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: JMIR Publications
• Journal: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 4
• Pages: e36842-e36842
• Publication date: 2022-08-30
• DOI: 10.2196/36842
• EISSN: 2369-2529
• ISSN: 2369-2529
• Language: English
• Keywords: Physical therapy; Medicine; Health care; MEDLINE; Inclusion (mineral); Nursing; Psychology; Telehealth; Systematic review; Family medicine; Psychological intervention; Cerebral palsy; Telemedicine