Journal article
How much conversation content is actually social: human conversational behaviour revisited
- Abstract:
- Our study explores aspects of human conversation within the framework of evolutionary psychology, focusing on the proportion of 'social' to 'non-social' content in casual conversation. Building upon the seminal study by Dunbar et al. (1997, Human Nature, 8, 231-246), which posited that two-thirds of conversation gravitates around social matters, our findings indicate an even larger portion, approximately 85% being of a social nature. Additionally, we provide a nuanced categorisation of 'social' rooted in the principles of evolutionary psychology. Similarly to Dunbar et al.'s findings, our results support theories of human evolution that highlight the importance of social interactions and information exchange and the importance of the exchange of social information in human interactions across various contexts.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 742.6KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/langcog.2024.54
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Language and Cognition More from this journal
- Volume:
- 17
- Article number:
- e11
- Publication date:
- 2025-01-09
- Acceptance date:
- 2024-08-27
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1866-9859
- ISSN:
-
1866-9808
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2080635
- UUID:
-
uuid_82fceeb4-3c12-448e-afc9-2e116192a2f4
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2080635
- Source identifiers:
-
W4406220567
- Deposit date:
-
2026-02-02
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Szala et al
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record