Journal article icon

Journal article

‘Nechto eroticheskoe’, ‘courir après l'ombre’? – logistical imperatives and the fall of Tashkent, 1859–1865

Abstract:
This article explores the debates that preceded the Russian conquest of Tashkent in 1865. It argues that none of the explanations usually given for this – the ‘men on the spot’, ‘cotton hunger’, or the Great Game with Britain – is satisfactory. Instead, it shows that the War Ministry and the governors of Orenburg had advocated the capture of Tashkent from the late 1850s, and that General Cherniaev's assault in 1865 was at least tacitly authorized. The motives for the Russian advance combined the need for better supply chains to the steppe fortresses, a desire to ‘anchor’ their new frontier in a region with a sedentary population, and concern for security from attacks by the Khoqand Khanate. Economic considerations and rivalry with Britain played very minor roles.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1080/02634937.2014.909131

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
History Faculty
Oxford college:
New College
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Taylor and Francis (Routledge)
Journal:
Central Asian Survey More from this journal
Volume:
33
Issue:
2
Pages:
153-169
Publication date:
2014-05-27
DOI:
EISSN:
1465-3354
ISSN:
0263-4937


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:728722
UUID:
uuid:825574ba-31ef-43d2-a819-c6faabd6c5d3
Local pid:
pubs:728722
Source identifiers:
728722
Deposit date:
2017-11-16
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP