The double-edged sword of exemplar similarity

Journal article

We investigate how a firm’s positioning relative to category exemplars shapes security analysts’ evaluations. Employing a two-stage model of evaluation (initial screening and subsequent assessment), we propose that exemplar similarity enhances a firm’s recognizability and legitimacy, increasing the likelihood that it passes the initial screening stage and attracts analyst coverage. However, exemplar similarity may also prompt unfavorable comparisons with exemplar firms, leading to lower analyst recommendations in the assessment stage. We further argue that category coherence, distinctiveness, and exemplar typicality influence the impact of exemplar similarity on firm evaluation. Leveraging Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to analyze a sample of 7,603 US public firms from 1997 to 2022, we find robust support for our predictions. By highlighting the intricate role of strategic positioning vis-àvis category exemplars in shaping audience evaluations, our findings have important implications for research on positioning relative to category exemplars, category viability, optimal distinctiveness and security analysts.

Authors: Majzoubi, M; Zhao, EY; Zuzul, T; Fisher, G

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: INFORMS
• Journal: Organization Science
• Volume: 36
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 121-144
• Publication date: 2024-05-07
• Acceptance date: 2024-03-25
• DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.16855
• EISSN: 1526-5455
• ISSN: 1047-7039
• Language: English