Journal article icon

Journal article

Health system use and experience among people with poor mental health: A cross-sectional analysis of the People’s Voice Survey in 18 countries

Abstract:
Background: Across the globe, rates of depression and anxiety have risen substantially since the COVID pandemic. Consequently, poor mental health is now a top health policy priority in many countries and more people than ever are seeking treatment. While the segment of people with poor mental health is large and growing, there is a dearth of data about their demographics and health needs and their use of and experience in the health system. Health systems require this information to effectively organize and provide services. Methods and findings: We investigated population prevalence of fair or poor mental health and compared health system experience and quality of care among adults with poor versus good mental health in 18 high-, middle-, and low-income countries using data from the People’s Voice Survey (n = 32,419). Data were collected in 2022 and 2023 through a combination of nationally representative telephone, online, and in-person surveys. Prevalence of self-reported poor mental health ranged from 4.7% in Nigeria to 39.6% in China and was unrelated to national income per capita. More women than men reported poor mental health in most countries. Across all countries, people with poor mental health had worse self-rated overall health and more chronic illness. Between 0.9% (Lao PDR) and 52.4% (UK) of those with poor mental health had received mental healthcare in the past year. People with poor mental health reported lower patient activation, worse care quality, and lower confidence in the health system. A study limitation is that results are based on self-reported mental health rather than clinical diagnoses. Conclusions: People with poor mental health have markedly different health profiles and health system experience. These findings should prompt health systems to re-assess their services to better serve this growing patient group. Comparison of user experience and quality over time and across countries with similar health systems may assist in benchmarking performance.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004745

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9549-8432
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8070-0995
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2410-3015
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7851-1746
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2949-7252


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/100000865
Grant:
INV-005254
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/02gjn4306
Grant:
RG-T3768
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0456r8d26


Publisher:
Public Library of Science
Journal:
PLoS Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
23
Issue:
5
Pages:
e1004745
Article number:
e1004745
Publication date:
2026-05-05
Acceptance date:
2026-03-27
DOI:
EISSN:
1549-1676
ISSN:
1549-1277


Language:
English
Pubs id:
2415698
Local pid:
pubs:2415698
Source identifiers:
4015789
Deposit date:
2026-05-05
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP