What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies

Castelló, M; McAlpine, L; Sala-Bubaré, A; Inouye, K; Skakni, I

Neuroscience & Neuroimaging Research Collection

Journal article

What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies

Abstract:: Abstract Over the past two decades, identity has emerged as a concept framing studies of early career researcher experience. Yet, identity is an amorphous concept, understood and used in a range of ways. This systematic review aimed to unpack the underpinnings of the notion of researcher identity. The final sample consisted of 38 empirical articles published in peer-reviewed journals in the last 20 years. Analyses focused on (a) identifying the dimensions used to define researcher identity, and (b) characterising the meta-theories—the underlying assumptions of the research—in relation to these dimensions. We identified four different stances towards researcher identity (clusters), based on variation on the identity dimensions in relation to the meta-theories. We characterised these as (1) transitioning among identities, (2) balancing identity continuity and change, (3) personal identity development through time and (4) personal and stable identity. These stances incorporate thought-provoking nuances and complex conceptualisations of the notion of researcher identity, for instance, that meta-theory was insufficient to characterise researcher identity stance. The contribution of the study is first to be able to differentiate four characterizations of researcher identity—important given that many studies had not clearly expressed a stance. The second is the potential of the four dimensions to help characterise identity, in past as well as future research—thus a useful tool for those working in this area. Many questions remain, but perhaps the biggest is to what extent and under what conditions is identity a productive notion for understanding early career researcher experience?

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., Sala-Bubaré, A., Inouye, K., & Skakni, I. (2020). What perspectives underlie ‘researcher identity’? A review of two decades of empirical studies. Higher Education, 81(3), 567–590.

MLA Style

Castelló, M, et al. “What Perspectives Underlie ‘Researcher Identity’? A Review of Two Decades of Empirical Studies.” Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 3, 2020, pp. 567–90.

Chicago Style

Castelló, M, L McAlpine, A Sala-Bubaré, K Inouye, and I Skakni. 2020. “What Perspectives Underlie ‘Researcher Identity’? A Review of Two Decades of Empirical Studies.” Higher Education 81 (3): 567–90.
Print