Journal article
FORM-2C (Frequency of Renal Monitoring – Creatinine and Cystatin C): an observational cohort study of primary care patients with reduced eGFR
- Abstract:
-
Background: Monitoring is the mainstay of chronic kidney disease management in primary care. There is little evidence on how best to monitor.
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of eGFR derived from creatinine or cystatin C, to predict renal function decline among those with a recent eGFR of 30-89 ml/min/1.73m².
Design and setting: Observational cohort study in UK primary care.
Method: In 750 adult patients with a recent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30-89 ml/min/1.73m² both creatinine and cystatin C were measured at seven study visits over two years. The primary outcome was change in eGFR derived from creatinine or cystatin C between 6 and 24 months.
Results: Average change in eGFR was 0.51 ml/min/1.73m²/year or -2.35 ml/min/1.73m²/year when estimated by creatinine or cystatin C respectively. The c-statistic for predicting renal decline using creatinine-derived eGFR was 0.495 (95% CI 0.471 to 0.519). The equivalent c-statistic using cystatin C-derived eGFR was 0.497 (95% CI 0.468 to 0.525). Similar results were obtained when restricting analyses to those over or under 75 years, or with eGFR above 60 ml/min/1.73m2. In those with eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73m2 cystatin C-derived eGFR was more predictive than creatinine-derived eGFR for future decline.
Conclusion: In the primary analysis neither eGFR estimated from creatinine nor cystatin C predicted future change in kidney function, partly due to small changes during two years. In some secondary analyses there was a suggestion that cystatin C to estimate eGFR was a more useful biomarker, especially in those with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 119.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0940
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
- Volume:
- 71
- Issue:
- 710
- Pages:
- e677-e684
- Publication date:
- 2021-08-26
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-04-07
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1170811
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1170811
- Deposit date:
-
2021-04-08
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Fleming et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record