Journal article
How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge
- Abstract:
- Many of those who come to a belief in the God of classical theism do so solely as a result of having had an experience which they believe it is reasonable for them to interpret as a revelation of His experience directly and graciously given to them by God Himself. I shall argue that - at least in the first instance - such people should probably not think of themselves as knowing that there is a God if they are also traditional libertarians and believe in Robert Nozick's theory of knowledge.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 87.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0034412503006577
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Religious Studies More from this journal
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 347-357
- Publication date:
- 2003-09-01
- Edition:
- Publisher's version
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-901X
- ISSN:
-
0034-4125
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:8046f8cc-fd97-4820-872f-fa40fda507eb
- Local pid:
-
ora:1497
- Deposit date:
-
2008-03-14
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright date:
- 2003
- Notes:
- Citation: Mawson, T. J. (2003). 'How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge', Religious Studies, 39(3), 347-357. [Available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RES].
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record