Factors Influencing Team Performance: What Can Support Teams in High-Performance Sport Learn from Other Industries? A Systematic Scoping Review

Journal article

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of our systematic scoping review was to explore the factors influencing team function and performance across various industries and discuss findings in the context of the high-performance sport support team setting. These outcomes may also be used to inform future research into high-performance teamwork in sport. METHODS: A systematic scoping review of literature published in English since 2000 reporting team-based performance outcomes and included a performance metric that was ‘team outcome based’ was conducted using search of the Academic Search Ultimate, Medline, Business Source Ultimate, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Military database (ProQuest) using the terms: ‘team’, ‘function’ OR ‘dysfunction’, ‘Perform*’ OR ‘outcome’. RESULTS: Application of the search strategy identified a total of 11,735 articles for title and abstract review. Seventy-three articles were selected for full-text assessment with the aim to extract data for either quantitative or qualitative analysis. Forty-six of the 73 articles met our inclusion criteria; 27 articles were excluded as they did not report a performance metric. Eleven studies explored leadership roles and styles on team performance, three studies associated performance feedback to team performance, and 12 studies explored the relationship between supportive behaviour and performance. Team orientation and adaptability as key figures of team performance outcomes were explored in 20 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified 4 key variables that were associated with team function and performance across a variety of industries; (i) leadership styles, (ii) supportive team behaviour, (iii) communication, and (iv) performance feedback. High-performance teams wishing to improve performance should examine these factors within their team and its environment. It is widely acknowledged that the dynamics of team function is important for outcomes in high-performance sport, yet there is little evidence to provide guidance. This inequality between real-world need and the available evidence should be addressed in future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-021-00406-7

Authors: Salcinovic, B; Drew, M; Dijkstra, P; Waddington, G; Serpell, BG

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Springer
• Journal: Sports Medicine - Open
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 25-25
• Article number: 25
• Publication date: 2022-02-22
• DOI: 10.1186/s40798-021-00406-7
• EISSN: 2198-9761
• ISSN: 2199-1170
• Language: English
• Keywords: Team composition; Marketing; Systematic review; Team Role Inventories; Computer science; Medicine; Applied psychology; Teamwork; CINAHL; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Business; Management; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Team effectiveness; Performance management; MEDLINE; Medical education; PsycINFO; Social psychology; Political science