Journal article icon

Journal article

Development of the face-to-face component and recruitment strategy of a primary care digital social intervention for patients with asthma: Qualitative focus groups and interviews with stakeholders

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: 5.4 million people in the UK have asthma, with one third experiencing suboptimal control, leading to co-morbidities and increased healthcare use. A quarter of people with long-term conditions informally access peer support through online health communities (OHCs). However, integrating online peer support into primary care services to facilitate self-management is a new concept. OBJECTIVES: To develop together with stakeholders the content, delivery, and recruitment strategy of a digital social intervention to promote use of online peer support amongst asthma patients in primary care. METHODS: Data was collected by qualitative, audio-recorded, one-to-one interviews with clinicians, and focus groups with patients with asthma from East London general practices. The topic guide was informed by patient and public involvement work. Data collected was iterative (i.e. new ideas were added to subsequent interviews and focus groups). Verbatim transcripts were uploaded to NVivo12 and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Twenty patients from several ethnicities participated across five focus groups, and three general practitioners and three practice nurses were interviewed. The study's outputs included: the intervention's face-to-face content; content of clinician training; patient-facing leaflets/material; and a survey to recruit eligible patients. An intervention consisting of a structured consultation with a primary care clinician followed by OHC engagement, was developed based on three generated themes: 'introducing OHCs', describing how clinicians should introduce OHCs; 'OHC engagement', describing factors influencing OHC engagement; and 'clinician training'. CONCLUSION: Findings will assist clinicians in consultations about supporting self-management of patients through OHCs. Future research should evaluate feasibility, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of such support
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1080/13814788.2024.2407594

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0623-8231
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0008-6940-6427
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7935-8694
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7454-6354


Publisher:
Taylor and Francis Group
Journal:
European Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
30
Issue:
1
Pages:
2407594-2407594
Publication date:
2024-09-27
DOI:
EISSN:
1751-1402
ISSN:
1381-4788


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2406985
Local pid:
pubs:2406985
Source identifiers:
W4402926559
Deposit date:
2026-04-23
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP