Journal article
Reconsidering the origins of Forsbergh birefringence patterns
- Abstract:
- In 1949, Forsbergh, Jr. reported spontaneous spatial ordering in the birefringence patterns seen in flux-grown BaTiO3 crystals under the transmission polarized light microscope [Phys. Rev. 76, 1187 (1949)]. Stunningly regular square-net arrays were often only found within a finite temperature window and could be induced on both heating and cooling, suggesting genuine thermodynamic stability. At the time, Forsbergh rationalized the patterns to have resulted from the impingement of ferroelastic domains, creating a complex tessellation of variously shaped domain packets. However, no direct evidence for the intricate microstructural arrangement proposed by Forsbergh has subsequently been found. Moreover, there are no robust thermodynamic arguments to explain the finite region of thermal stability, its occurrence just below the Curie temperature, and the apparent increase in entropy associated with the loss of the Forsbergh pattern on cooling. Despite decades of research on ferroelectrics, this ordering phenomenon and its thermodynamic origin have hence remained a mystery. In this paper, we reexamine the microstructure of flux-grown BaTiO3 crystals, which show Forsbergh birefringence patterns. Given an absence of any obvious arrays of domain polyhedra or even regular shapes of domain packets, we suggest an alternative origin for the Forsbergh pattern in which sheets of orthogonally oriented ferroelastic stripe domains simply overlay one another. We show explicitly that the Forsbergh birefringence pattern occurs if the periodicity of the stripe domains is above a critical value. Moreover, by considering well-established semiempirical models, we show that the significant domain coarsening needed to generate the Forsbergh birefringence is fully expected in a finite window below the Curie temperature. We hence present a much more straightforward rationalization of the Forsbergh pattern than that originally proposed in which exotic thermodynamic arguments are unnecessary
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 6.8MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.024109
Authors
- Publisher:
- American Physical Society
- Journal:
- Physical Review B More from this journal
- Volume:
- 94
- Issue:
- 2
- Article number:
- 024109
- Publication date:
- 2016-07-12
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-04-27
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2469-9969
- ISSN:
-
2469-9950
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:633905
- UUID:
-
uuid:7ec4cb5e-0af1-401e-9a17-83dd122a4de6
- Local pid:
-
pubs:633905
- Source identifiers:
-
633905
- Deposit date:
-
2016-07-13
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- American Physical Society
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- © 2016 American Physical Society. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from American Physical Society at: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.024109
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record