Journal article
Self-monitoring blood pressure in hypertension – internet based survey of UK general practitioners
- Abstract:
-
Background
Previous research suggests most UK General Practitioners (GPs) use self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) to monitor control of hypertension rather than for diagnosis. This study sought to assess current practice in the use of self-monitoring and any changes in practice following more recent guideline recommendations.
Aim
To survey views and practice with regard to SMBP of UK GPs in 2015 and to compare to a previous survey in 2011.
Design and setting
Web-based survey of a regionally representative sample of 300 UK GPs.
Method
GPs completed an on-line questionnaire concerning the use of SMBP in the management of hypertension. Analyses comprised descriptive statistics, tests for between group differences (z test, Wilcoxon, chi square), and multivariate logistic regression.
Results
Results were available from 300 GPs (94% of those who started the survey). GPs reported using self-monitoring for diagnosing hypertension (169/291 (58% (95%CI 52-64))) and to monitor control (245/291 (84% (80-88))), the former significantly increased since 2011 (from 37% (33-41), p<0.001) with no change in monitoring for control. More than half of the GPs used higher systolic thresholds for diagnosis and treatment than recommended in guidelines and under half (120/169 GPs (42% (95%CI 36-47))) adjusted SMBP results for use in guiding treatment decisions.
Conclusion
Since new UK national guidance in 2011, GPs are more likely to use SMBP in the diagnosis of hypertension but significant proportions continue to use non-standard diagnostic and monitoring thresholds. The use of out of office methods to improve the accuracy of diagnosis is unlikely to be beneficial if sub optimal thresholds are used.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 135.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/bjgp16X687037
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
- Volume:
- 66
- Issue:
- 652
- Pages:
- e831-e837
- Publication date:
- 2016-11-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-05-24
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:624994
- UUID:
-
uuid:7e83ec68-020a-4c1b-83f8-1052efcd2eb0
- Local pid:
-
pubs:624994
- Source identifiers:
-
624994
- Deposit date:
-
2016-05-31
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- British Journal of General Practice
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
-
Copyright
© 2016 British Journal of General Practice. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from the Royal College of General Practitioners at: [10.3399/bjgp16X687037]
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record