Journal article icon

Journal article

Self-monitoring blood pressure in hypertension – internet based survey of UK general practitioners

Abstract:
Background
Previous research suggests most UK General Practitioners (GPs) use self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) to monitor control of hypertension rather than for diagnosis. This study sought to assess current practice in the use of self-monitoring and any changes in practice following more recent guideline recommendations.

Aim
To survey views and practice with regard to SMBP of UK GPs in 2015 and to compare to a previous survey in 2011.

Design and setting
Web-based survey of a regionally representative sample of 300 UK GPs.

Method
GPs completed an on-line questionnaire concerning the use of SMBP in the management of hypertension. Analyses comprised descriptive statistics, tests for between group differences (z test, Wilcoxon, chi square), and multivariate logistic regression.

Results
Results were available from 300 GPs (94% of those who started the survey). GPs reported using self-monitoring for diagnosing hypertension (169/291 (58% (95%CI 52-64))) and to monitor control (245/291 (84% (80-88))), the former significantly increased since 2011 (from 37% (33-41), p<0.001) with no change in monitoring for control. More than half of the GPs used higher systolic thresholds for diagnosis and treatment than recommended in guidelines and under half (120/169 GPs (42% (95%CI 36-47))) adjusted SMBP results for use in guiding treatment decisions.

Conclusion
Since new UK national guidance in 2011, GPs are more likely to use SMBP in the diagnosis of hypertension but significant proportions continue to use non-standard diagnostic and monitoring thresholds. The use of out of office methods to improve the accuracy of diagnosis is unlikely to be beneficial if sub optimal thresholds are used.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp16X687037

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
66
Issue:
652
Pages:
e831-e837
Publication date:
2016-11-01
Acceptance date:
2016-05-24
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:624994
UUID:
uuid:7e83ec68-020a-4c1b-83f8-1052efcd2eb0
Local pid:
pubs:624994
Source identifiers:
624994
Deposit date:
2016-05-31
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP