Journal article

Authors’ reply re: Inadequate safety reporting in pre‐eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Authors’ reply re: Inadequate safety reporting in pre‐eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation. (2018). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 126(1), 129.

MLA Style

“Authors’ Reply Re: Inadequate Safety Reporting in Pre‐Eclampsia Trials: a Systematic Evaluation.” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 126, no. 1, Wiley, 2018, p. 129.

Chicago Style

“Authors’ Reply Re: Inadequate Safety Reporting in Pre‐Eclampsia Trials: a Systematic Evaluation.” 2018. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 126 (1): 129.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: 37227_0_art_0_pdr958.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 44.5KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1111/1471-0528.15450

Authors

+ Duffy, J More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: MSD
Department:: Primary Care Health Sciences
Oxford college:: Balliol College
Role:: Author

+ Pealing, L More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: Medical Sciences Division
Department:: Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:: Author

+ McManus, R More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: Medical Sciences Division
Department:: Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:: Author

+ on behalf of the International Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Pre‐eclampsia (iHOPE) More by this author

Role:: Author

Publisher:: Wiley
Journal:: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology More from this journal
Volume:: 126
Issue:: 1
Pages:: 129
Publication date:: 2018-09-21
Acceptance date:: 2018-08-20
DOI:: 10.1111/1471-0528.15450
EISSN:: 1471-0528
ISSN:: 1470-0328

Pubs id:: pubs:909271
UUID:: uuid:7ca752e1-fa4d-41da-b28a-437bb8c21b3a
Local pid:: pubs:909271
Source identifiers:: 909271
Deposit date:: 2018-09-06

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Copyright date:: 2018
Notes:: © 2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from John Wiley & Sons at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15450

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP