Journal article
Extinction rates, extinction-prone habitats, and indicator groups in Britain and at larger scales
- Abstract:
-
We present the first detailed comparison of extinction rates amongst a wide range of nonmarine groups, using data from Britain. For selected taxa, comparisons are made with rates in the United States and the globe. We estimate the overall extinction rate in Britain is 1-5% of the regional species list per century. Most of the groups of organisms assessed have very similar rates, with high rates in some groups which are aquatic, use dead wood or are on their climatic margin. In Britain, the extinction rate probably rose from the 19th to the 20th Century, and is projected to rise in the 21st Century. Habitat loss is the principal driver of extinctions. In Britain, birds are relatively good indicators of extinction rates and extinction-prone habitats, whilst butterflies are not. At larger scales, such as the USA and globally, birds, freshwater fish and amphibians show potential as indicators. Consideration of 'Possibly Extinct' species and monitoring of habitat area may provide more responsive measures of biodiversity loss.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, doc, 441.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.004
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Biological Conservation More from this journal
- Volume:
- 144
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 713-721
- Publication date:
- 2011-02-01
- Edition:
- Accepted Manuscript
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0006-3207
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:7bc0e7fa-e1e8-4f24-bc32-47b214a70399
- Local pid:
-
ora:7184
- Deposit date:
-
2013-08-15
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Ltd
- Copyright date:
- 2010
- Notes:
- NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, [VOL 144, ISSUE 2, (February 2011] DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.004
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record