Journal article icon

Journal article

Beyond good and bad: rethinking solidarity and coercion in public health

Abstract:
We often use certain terms as if, in using them, they contain a decided moral judgement of an action. Especially in public health ethics, this is not always the case, as shown most starkly by recent (mis)use of the terms ‘solidarity’ and ‘coercion’ to label, and thereby judge, public health actions responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyse the terms solidarity and coercion, and argue that they cannot be used alone as moral judgements of public health actions. Rather, they are better considered as descriptive terms that are merely frequent proxies for normative terms such as justice or utility. We illustrate our argument by reference to three case studies: school reopenings in the USA, mandatory isolation measures in the UK, and vaccine distribution within the EU.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1080/15265161.2026.2632018

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
Population Health
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2071-4302


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
221719/Z/20/Z
320225/Z/24/Z


Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
American Journal of Bioethics More from this journal
Publication date:
2026-02-27
Acceptance date:
2026-02-05
DOI:
EISSN:
1536-0075
ISSN:
1526-5161


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2368421
Local pid:
pubs:2368421
Deposit date:
2026-02-06
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP