Journal article icon

Journal article

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

Abstract:
The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and practice, the outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public, health care professionals and others making decisions about health care. It is now widely acknowledged that insufficient attention has been paid to the choice of outcomes measured in clinical trials. Researchers are increasingly addressing this issue through the development and use of a core outcome set, an agreed standardised collection of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all trials for a specific clinical area.Accumulating work in this area has identified the need for guidance on the development, implementation, evaluation and updating of core outcome sets. This Handbook, developed by the COMET Initiative, brings together current thinking and methodological research regarding those issues. We recommend a four-step process to develop a core outcome set. The aim is to update the contents of the Handbook as further research is identified.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
Trials More from this journal
Volume:
18
Issue:
Suppl 3
Pages:
280
Publication date:
2017-06-01
Acceptance date:
2017-05-02
DOI:
ISSN:
1745-6215


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:703140
UUID:
uuid:79c23bfc-0650-4eb1-aa70-5048dfeb7fa9
Local pid:
pubs:703140
Source identifiers:
703140
Deposit date:
2017-07-10

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP