Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

What are patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on managing penicillin allergy? A qualitative evidence synthesis

Abstract:
Objectives: To review the existing literature on patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on managing penicillin allergy and provide an interpretation of the evidence that will inform the development of strategies to increase penicillin allergy evaluation and testing. Methods: We systematically searched six databases for qualitative or mixed-methods studies reporting patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on managing penicillin allergy. We followed three stages of thematic synthesis, including line-by-line coding, development of descriptive themes, and development of analytical themes, to analyse and interpret the findings of eligible studies. Results: We included 21 papers in the review and using thematic synthesis developed five analytical themes: (i) investigation of penicillin allergy was not a priority; (ii) healthcare systems did not support penicillin allergy assessment; (iii) penicillin allergy assessment required specific training; (iv) uncertainty over responsibility in managing penicillin allergy; and (v) management of penicillin allergy was associated with perception of risk and diagnostic uncertainty. Conclusions: To increase penicillin allergy assessment and testing, the lack of prioritization of penicillin allergy assessment in clinical practice should be addressed. Education of patients and healthcare professionals should emphasize the benefits of penicillin allergy assessment and explain the risks associated with allergy testing and subsequent use of penicillin. Healthcare systems–related barriers hindering penicillin allergy assessment could be reduced through the redesign of electronic medical records and the revision of antibiotic guidelines. Future research should explore novel models for penicillin allergy assessment services involving different healthcare settings.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/jacamr/dlag049

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0008-2929-7000
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0163-1547
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
GLAM
Department:
ALS - Science Subject Area
Sub department:
Health Care Libraries
Role:
Author
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-0193-8677
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4470-1151


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/052gg0110


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance More from this journal
Volume:
8
Issue:
2
Article number:
dlag049
Publication date:
2026-04-20
DOI:
EISSN:
2632-1823
ISSN:
2632-1823


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2411842
Local pid:
pubs:2411842
Source identifiers:
3966176
Deposit date:
2026-04-21
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP