From India to Australia and back again: An alternative genealogy of The elementary forms of religious life

Journal article

This article argues that, although we think of Australian tribal ritual as Durkheim’s source material for his masterwork The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, we must also consider the extensive Indological scholarship on which he draws – and with which he debates – as critical inspirations for the text. His extensive engagement with his nephew, Marcel Mauss, whose earlier work, Sacrifice, with Henri Hubert, was premised on an analysis of Vedic ritual, would have been one source for his study of religion writ large; Elementary Forms also takes up in detail the work of Max Müller, among other Indologists, whose work was well known and widely engaged with in the French and broader European intellectual context of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This article argues that the Indological comparative lens was key to Durkheim’s own approach as he worked to articulate the relationship between religion and society; in contrast to the philologists, he argued for the primacy of practice over language in ritual action.

Authors: Hausner, S

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Berghahn Journals
• Journal: Durkheimian Studies
• Volume: 23
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 128-144
• Publication date: 2017-12-01
• Acceptance date: 2019-05-22
• DOI: 10.3167/ds.2017.230108
• EISSN: 1752-2307
• ISSN: 1362-024X
• Language: English
• Keywords: Max Müller; Indology; Marcel Mauss; sacrifice; Vedic ritual